Reporters from the Associated Press and CNN were barred from an EPA summit on contaminants. Were they excluded in retaliation for negative coverage?

Was the exclusion of CNN and AP reporters from an EPA summit a measure of retaliation? Photo by Kristi Blokhin / Shutterstock.com

In the midst of Scott Pruitt’s mounting controversies, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) held a summit on chemicals in drinking water on Tuesday, but forbade media reporters from CNN and Associated Press from entering the building. EPA spokesperson Jahan Wilcox told both organizations that they were not allowed in, claiming that there was no space for them. Wilcox, however, gave no specific indication as to why they were barred, according to AP.

Tensions within the summit escalated when guards forcibly removed a female reporter from the premises after she asked to speak with the EPA’s public affairs representative. Speaking on behalf of the EPA, Scott Pruitt announced to 200 people at the meeting that dealing with the water contaminants perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl is a “national priority.”

After receiving backlash on Twitter ensued over what the AP and CNN called their “selective” exclusion from the summit, the agency decided to open the remainder of the two-day event to all reporters.

Civics Lesson: The First Amendment and Freedom of the Press

Freedom of the press is enshrined in the First Amendment.Freedom of the press under the First Amendment to the Constitution, states: “Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech or of the press.” Freedom of the press is the right to circulate opinions in print without censorship or retaliation by the government.

In addition, they were no longer allowed to prohibit reporters from attending the summit, as reported by Business Insider:

“The Federal Advisory Committee Act, which governs how meetings like Tuesday’s must be conducted, states that any event used by a federal agency “in the interest of obtaining advice or recommendations” must be open to the public, which includes the press.”

An EPA spokesperson told NBC News that, “This was simply an issue of the room reaching capacity, which reporters were aware of prior to the event.” But the guards reportedly didn’t tell the reporters they ejected that they had reached capacity, and other journalists in the room at the time reported that there were, in fact, a handful of seats still available.

The EPA works for the public, not any individual trade organizations. Therefore, the public (which includes the press) has the right to know what it is up to. When the EPA forcibly throws reporters out of public events, they are violating the First Amendment.

Scott Pruitt, already plagued by scandals, would be wise to avoid infringing the U.S. Constitution.

Facebook Comments
Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from Civics Nation

You have Successfully Subscribed!

%d bloggers like this: